I was real disappointed with this book, especially the fluff part (make believe) not matching the reality of gameplay. So much could have been done, but wasn't. There should be a shooty army and I'd give my left nut for some kind of mechanized demon army. Half the model range is old (crappy in my opinon, honestly who wants more plastic already?) and the other half is a mix of new metal, new plastic, some good models and quite a bit of bad. Not exactly a real diversity to influence people to buy said army, right?
Now this book has plenty of models, sadly the majority of them have the same role-kill infantry and hope to attrition vehicles to death. Unlike the Necrons, who suffered from a dearth of models but few distinct roles.oh boy, GW figured out half of the issue. Sadly, like the 'robots' or more aptly, the Terminator 's not a good addition to the 40k universe. My opinion on this book? It's a new army for 40k. I figured giving my editorial opinion on the book is the best way to do this, and still do what I wanted to do-which is give everyone an in-depth look at the Daemon Codex. Well, unlike a lot of reviews done via quick posts on forums or a mention on podcasts, I wanted something that would last.
So, where do we begin with the Daemonic Codex for Warhammer 40k?
